Skip to content

Cyber Essentials Plus Readiness Guide

Good readiness work is usually quiet work - clear scope, fewer unknowns, cleaner ownership, and enough evidence that nobody has to improvise during assessment week.

Published05 May 2026

Updated3 weeks ago

Read time4 min. 775 words.

AuthorGyorgy Bolyki

Cyber Essentials Plus goes more smoothly when Microsoft 365 is treated as part of the real estate, not as a side platform. Entra ID, Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, Intune and Defender all affect the assessment story when they control access, devices or data movement.

Quick answer

Before booking assessment dates, prove the scope, MFA coverage, endpoint sample health, patch evidence, malware protection, external sharing position and audit trail. If any of those depend on memory rather than evidence, fix that first.

Who this affects

This affects UK SMEs with Microsoft 365-heavy operations, remote staff, Intune-managed devices, SharePoint/Teams collaboration and customer pressure to show Cyber Essentials Plus readiness.

It is also useful where a business has passed the self-assessment before but has not checked whether the live tenant and endpoint sample still match the answers.

What usually goes wrong

Failure modeWhat it looks likeWhy it hurts
Fuzzy scopeCloud services, BYOD or supplier access are discussed lateEvidence collection becomes chaotic
MFA assumptionRegistration exists but enforcement has broad exclusionsCloud service authentication may not be covered
Endpoint mismatchIntune, Defender and asset lists disagreeSample checks become slow and defensive
Patch gapsDevices cannot show update status cleanlyThe 14-day evidence story weakens
Weak ownershipNobody owns exceptions or exportsAssessment week depends on heroics

What to check first

Start with the areas that decide pass/fail conversations fastest.

AreaFirst checkUseful console or report
ScopeWhich Microsoft 365 services and devices are in scopeWritten scope list and asset inventory
IdentityMFA enforcement for users, admins and cloud accessConditional Access or Security Defaults evidence
EndpointSample devices are managed, supported and protectedIntune, Defender and update reports
MailForwarding and phishing controls are knownExchange Online and Defender policy views
CollaborationExternal sharing and guest access are deliberateSharePoint, OneDrive and Teams settings
AuditLogs and exports are availablePurview audit search and report exports

Identity and access controls

Identity is where a lot of passes and fails are decided.

  • MFA enforced for cloud service access.
  • Privileged access separated from day-to-day use.
  • Old admin roles removed.
  • Leaver process closes or disables accounts promptly.
  • Guest and third-party access reviewed and justified.
  • Break-glass accounts documented and monitored.

The practical test is simple. Pick one normal user, one admin and one guest. Can you explain exactly what each can reach and what controls apply?

Endpoint and patch checks

Policy intent is not enough. Device state has to line up with what the consoles say.

  • Device inventory matches reality.
  • Supported operating systems only, or a tightly controlled exception position.
  • Security updates applied on time.
  • Defender or equivalent protection present and healthy.
  • Local admin rights genuinely minimised.
  • Firewalls enabled and managed.

Where Microsoft tooling is in use, check that the same devices appear consistently across Intune, Defender and update reporting. When those views disagree, something is usually drifting.

Evidence to collect

EvidenceWhat it should prove
Scope statementServices, users, locations and devices in scope
Admin rolesCurrent privileged users and review date
MFA enforcementPolicy scope, exclusions and grant controls
Endpoint sampleDevice ownership, OS support, patch and protection state
Mail postureForwarding, phishing controls and investigation capability
Sharing postureGuest and external link position
Audit capabilityWho can search/export logs and when evidence was exported

If you only have one afternoon, build an evidence folder and start dropping dated exports into it:

mkdir -p evidence/identity evidence/endpoints evidence/mail evidence/sharing
date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ" > evidence/exported-at.txt

Fix path

  1. Lock scope in writing.
  2. Remove obvious admin and MFA exceptions.
  3. Reconcile endpoint inventory across Intune, Defender and asset records.
  4. Patch or replace devices that cannot meet the sample standard.
  5. Review mail forwarding, guest access and external sharing.
  6. Export evidence and run a small internal sample before the assessor does.

Common mistakes

The common mistake is treating Cyber Essentials Plus as paperwork. The assessor will see the live estate, so screenshots that do not match the tenant only create more questions.

Another mistake is leaving evidence until assessment week. Weak evidence usually points to weak ownership.

For the matching service path, use Cyber Essentials Plus readiness.

If you want a fast first read, check your Microsoft 365 security score before the evidence sprint.

References

Related notes

Need help mapping this to your own tenant, controls, or assessment timeline?

© 2026 Magrathean UK Ltd. All rights reserved.